Showing posts with label Queen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queen. Show all posts

Monday, 16 June 2014

House Moves and Pension Moves

Just recovering from moving house, so therefore catching up a bit with all that has been happening in the world of pensions.

(Incidentally, well done to all the various third parties, institutions and providers –and especially the Post Office- for responding so well to our house move. All except BT that is. Did you know you can’t order broadband if there is no recognised house phone? Actually there is a house phone- but it’s been offline with the house being empty. Anyway, BT rant over....)

The main pension move of course has bee CDC’s. Not new, but a new energy for the idea post Queen’s Speech. And Steve Webb linking it to his Defined Ambition project. Is it really DC+ (to use a Webb phrase)? Sort of.

Plus in terms of increased certainty by way of volume. Plus in terms of lower costs, again due to volume. But not plus in terms of additional guarantees. The pot can still go down as well as up. There’s no protection even on pensions in payment.

I remember managing a Dutch CDC for a large international company. The news was not good one year. There were going to have to be reductions in pensions in payment. It was a hard one for the local Dutch company to manage in terms of a news story that could get out to the press. No one wants their pensioners to suffer. The US parent company didn't like it one bit. How did we get to this, they were asking? It was a communications nightmare.

What looks good on paper and works logically for pension professionals is still hard to explain to a member. Especially a pensioner who’s just found out they are getting less in their bank account each week.

Nevertheless, I think it’s a good step forward so long as we can manage the message with the members.

Thursday, 7 June 2012

Retirement at 86?

It's been quite a week. None of us will see a Diamond Jubilee celebrated by our king or Queen in our lifetime again. I’m not particularly a monarchist and the Queen is not a justifiable position in a truly democratic society, but the majority of her subjects would have it no other way. I'm grateful that she has served so well and brought purpose and meaning to a ‘United Kingdom' through her service.

And how things have changed during her reign. The Actuarial Post records that 'a boy born in 1952 was expected to live to 78 and a girl to 83. A boy born in 2012 is expected to live to 91 and a girl to 94.'

Proof indeed of the need for higher retirement ages, though I doubt many reading this will still be fully employed at the age of 86 as the Queen is!